By D. A. (Midwested) on Saturday, March 21, 2020 - 08:31 pm:
Part of me agrees with Cpt. Paul about the use of High Dynamic Range photos, but I've overcome to some degree the negativity that the HDR images create. Imagine for a second if someone had hand painted these images. Our opinions would be different.
So an HDR image is created by the by the camera (or maybe a computer). The camera does this by automatically taking several pictures when you press the shutter button. Each picture is at a different exposure. Some are over exposed and some are under exposed. Then the camera combines all the images into one. This allows parts of the image that would normally be in dark shadows (underexposed) or in overly white areas (overexposed) to be detected and corrected. All wonders of new technology.
Back in the old school days of film and chemicals and manually developing the film and then the light sensitive paper, photographers were able to do very similar "HDR things" but only in certain areas of the image (not every pixel). It's called dodging and burning during the exposure of the light sensitive paper through the negative film image. Ansel Adams was a master at this. He also manipulated the contrast during the development of the film in the chemicals. He would also wait days or weeks for the sunlight to become optimal.
By Capt. Paul (Eclogite) on Saturday, March 21, 2020 - 11:59 pm:
Used correctly, HDR is a wonderful tool to obtain fantastic photos. Unfortunately, too many people just turn it on without fine tuning the intricate details of the system to get the best photos possible. Not saying that's what happened here, but certain elements in the photos appear "unreal".