By Andy, Ohio on Monday, June 28, 2004 - 01:48 pm:
The CARMA survey sounds to me like the work of an avocationalist. Perhaps a hobby or spare time thing. The fact that the CARMA person uses an acronym that is one letter away from the word karma and also eschews anything to do with violence is also an indicator of this.
I work as an archaeologist (got my masters at Michigan Tech in Industrial Archaeology) and agree with a poster above that not including "hunting/violent" sites would essentially exclude perhaps 99% of all prehistoric sites on the continent. Hunting and its associated activities pretty much took place whereever native peoples stopped for the night (as well as a lot of European explorers and settlers). Fishing is an important industry in the historic settlement of the Lake Superior region, a lot of French-Canadian fishing villages were established around the same time as the first mineral explorations. If you examine the use of copper by native groups in the past, would you gloss over the copper fishhooks and spear points and knives?
Trapping? The whole establishment of the fur trade changed fundamental economic patterns for Eastern Woodland tribes. How can you hope to portray the culture of the tribes around the Great Lakes region if you don't address the fur trade and it's effects? I can understand with finding violence distasteful, but to ignore the effects of violent behavior in the lives of people, past and present, is to ignore a vital part of who we are and were.
Oh, and I would have guessed Jacobsville for the photo as well...
By CARMA Survey on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 - 03:52 am:
Would the author of this message please email webmaster@pasty.com
By Silenced on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 - 11:48 am:
So much sensorship. . .and so near the Forth of July, yet. Oh well, let Freedom ring.
By