By Dr. Nat (Drnat) on Friday, April 16, 2010 - 08:17 pm:
The question was concerning ash cooling the climate, not the health impacts of inhaling ash. That is a completely different thing.
As of right now, the amount of ash erupted by the volcano in Iceland is a very small volume compared to other eruptions. The most recent eruption to cause a measurable effect on climate was Mt. Pinatubo in 1991. This was an eruption of 5 km3 (dense rock equivalent) and it caused a drop in average temperature of 0.5 to 0.6° Celsius. As of right now, the volume and height of the Icelandic ash plume just isn’t enough to have a major impact.
That being said, if this eruption continues for a long enough time and enough ash and sulphur dioxide is ejected, climate could be affected. Icelandic volcanoes have caused climatic perturbations in the past. In 1783, Laki erupted for about eight months. This eruption created about 80 times the amount of sulphuric acid aerosols as the 1980 Mt. St. Helens eruption and caused average temperature to drop ~1° Celsius. In the Northeastern United States, the average decrease in temperature was close to 5° Celsius. Haze from this eruption was noted as far away as Syria and ultimately ¼ of the Icelandic population perished as a result of this eruption, most due to the resulting famine. Icelandic eruptions have also dropped ash across Europe in the past. A measureable ashfall occurred in Scandinavia in 1875 when a volcanic crater named Viti erupted.
What is different today is that air traffic is disrupted, so people are noticing a relatively small eruption.
And why would I consult Al Gore about volcanoes? He’s a journalist and politician. If I want to know about volcanoes or geology, I’ll go to an expert. Oh, yeah, I am an expert on that. And as far as inhaling ash, just look up Ruapehu eruption 1995. There’s some pretty good video online. I was there. I felt that ash and those lapilli hitting me. That was an experience!
By jbuck (Jbuck) on Friday, April 16, 2010 - 09:53 pm:
Thanks Capt. Paul!
Are there any studies concerning the impacts of the gases produced by volcanoes compared to those produced by human activity? How does the impact of the Iceland volcano stack up to 'xx' number of cars/trucks or whatever? Or are they so totally different as to be not comparable?
By jbuck (Jbuck) on Friday, April 16, 2010 - 09:55 pm:
And Dr. Nat ~
I was so enjoying the explanation that i didn't read who the author was of each post! My bad~
By Deb S. (Usedtobeayooper) on Monday, April 19, 2010 - 08:31 am:
Dr. Nat! You go girl! I guess you told "her"!!!